Evaluation of scientific research: the urgency of a paradigm shift

Authors

  • Luis Dorado González Scientific Information Resources Unit for Research (URICI), CSIC, Madrid

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20350/digitalCSIC/15382

Keywords:

bibliometrics, scientometrics, metadata, altmetrics, open science, COARA, impact factor, scientific activity evaluation

Abstract

This article reflects on the main drawbacks of the indicators currently used in evaluation systems. Below is a medium- and long-term proposal for changes in these evaluation processes through the consideration of new indicators, the expansion of editorial metadata schemes, and the use of open infrastructures

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2023-06-28

How to Cite

Dorado González, L. (2023). Evaluation of scientific research: the urgency of a paradigm shift. Enredadera: Journal of the CSIC Libraries and Archives Network, (39), 59–63. https://doi.org/10.20350/digitalCSIC/15382

Issue

No. 39 (2023): Evaluation of scientific activity: a present challenge

Section

Live

Categories

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Luis Dorado González

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.